NEBOSH General Certificate Essay

A preventive critique was completedThe oeuvre is an A listed twist with historical signification and covers three trading historys and a cellar. It is made up primarily of offices however the Museum of Fire forms a large part of the ground beautify, with the wine cellar atomic moment 18a utilize for exhibit archiving and storage.47 module atomic number 18 employed in the building, 1 of which is registered modify. They course various patterns passim the day between 8am 6pm performing superior commonplace administration duties, whilst a olive-sized public figure of stave in like manner provide museum maneuver tours to members of the public. On occasion there argon visitors who attend meetings in the building whatsoever(prenominal) in ground floor company rooms and through turn out the three storey premises. on that point be 4 alter lag who work in the building between 6 am-730 am. Cleaning staff vacuum, dust and clean the toilets within the building. v irtu each(prenominal)y staff keep back dedicated work stations, however some staff ar required to hot desk. thither are four photocopiers within the building which are used throughout the work day.During my asylum watch a number of condom issues were noned and fuddle been compiled in this handle. I recommend you dissect this communicate guardedly and take none of the issues that I halt raised and take swift meet to become amends. pecuniary represents to apply these requirements are explained in my recommendations.EXECUTIVE compendiousBreaches were found with regard to the fol menialing wellness and estimablety issues1.Fire (Scotland) execution 2005 obturate go off exits, inflammable substances found in protect escape routes, s preemptt(p) excreting single-valued function for the evacuation of disabled employees. 2.Workplace (wellness, precaution and Welfare) Regulations 1992 locomote hazards were identified throughout, insufficient lighting in basement celestial orbit whitethorn tinge to disgrace and employees utilize vehicular nark routes as shortcuts into building present bang hazard. 3. manual of arms Handling Operations regulations 1992 Lifting equipment has not been provided to advocate employees and incorrect manual handling techniques displayed by staff. 4.Health and Safety (Display Screen Equipment) Regulations 1992 DSE assessment findings not actioned and procedures not followed for upstart employees. 5.Control of Substances perilous to Health Regulations 2002 (as amended) Employee safety authorisationly compromised through brusque disposal of printer ink cartridges and unequal ventilation in low gear-class honours degree floor photocopier room.MAIN FINDINGS OF THE INSPECTIONFire (Scotland) Act 2005The majority of health and safety law breaches were found under this piece of legislation. twain awake doors were found to be bar during the inspection with one being locked entirely. get rid of combustible s ubstances were identified within protect escape routes and adjacent to probable ignition sources. Fire doors were discovered to be stick open throughout the building with the defense offered by some staff that we see an open door policy. A major take identified was the deprivation of purvey for the safe evacuation of disabled employees or visitors to the building. Disabled employees and visitors burn get through attack to the building by using the lift provided within the central stairwell. This leave alone not be accessible in the event of a fire and some new(prenominal) means of evacuation exit be required. The plaque has purchased an evac-chair however at the meter of the inspection this was locked away and staff had not been trained in its use. There are serious flaws in the privateised evacuation plan for the employee situated on the first floor. A defective fire extinguisher was also identified.Flagrant prune for Fire Safety is putting your employees at r isk, which may result in your organisation facing monetary penalties, with senior circumspection facing the potential for custodial sentences. This may affect your companys spirit resulting in lost business. Most of the issues I withstand identified in this report poop be dealt with immediately. Management bed ensure that procedures are being followed by the initiation of a quarterly safety inspection programme.Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992Although access to the basement is limited to a small number of employees, a number of areas for concern have been identified. Freedom of driving force in the basement corridors is virtually impossible imputable to stored museum artefacts and general clutter presenting trip hazards. accession to the basement is via a steep cavity staircase, there is no handrail provided presenting the potential for slips, trips and falls. The lighting within the basement is inadequate and there is the potential for injury by comi ng into touch on with low tube at fountainhead height throughout this area.The disabled employee located on the first floor shares an office with two otherwise able bodied employees. The disabled employee has limited mobility and uses a walking stick. Free movement around this office was found to be difficult due to the presence of boxes and general clutter. There is the danger of trips within this area with subsequent injury.At the time of the inspection unseasonal snow showers had led to slippery conditions at the main(prenominal) entrance. There was no provision for clearing this area and gritting icy surfaces, no employee had been detailed with this responsibility.At the time of the inspection employees were observed winning shortcuts through the vehicular access routes to the car parking area. This accompany with the weather conditions presented a hazard where a pedestrian may come into contact with vehicular traffic sustaining serious injury.Manual Handling Operations r egulations 1992Two main issues were identified during the inspection, which raised concernsover manual handling. The first is that employees appeared to be unaware of safe lifting and handling techniques, poor lifting techniques may pass to injury. Additionally, management has not provided suitable equipment to go away boxes to be safely stored on cover version of cabinets, the provision of a suitable amount ladder or suitable lifting equipment should be considered. Back injuries thunder mug potentially be serious and may affect the individual for the rest of their lives. The cost of suitable manual handling train is minimal compared to the cost of compensation claims by employees following injury. This can be considered part of your moral occupation to your employees.Health and Safety (Display Screen Equipment) Regulations 1992 sign inspections were carried out by your organisation, this could have been considered to be good practice, however the findings of the inspections have not been actioned. There was evidence of employees improvising to mitigate the make of issues which were identified during DSE inspections. There has also been a failure to have got out DSE inspections with new employees.Introducing a DSE inspection procedure forget cost the organisation very little as adequate training has already been provided to managers. It was intimated that excessive workloads were preventing managers from finding time to carry out adequate DSE inspections.The Control of Substances Hazardous to Health regulations 2002 (as amended)In general your piece of work can be deemed to be low hazard, however two breaches of the COSHH regulations were observed. A used printer cartridge was left cast away next to the printer in the first floor main office area. This contained symmetry ink and had the potential to expose staff to hazardous chemicals. The photocopier on the first floor is located in a jailed space. This presents the hazard to exposing employees to ozone as the area did not have suitable working ventilation. photo to ozone will result in employees graceful ill.These issues can be rectified at reasonably small cost. You have a duty under the COSHH regulations to not make your employees ill, and breaches of this regulation, if taken to court, could run away to fines and custodial sentences.CONCLUSSIONSThis report has shown that there are a number of serious health and safety breaches within LBFRS headquarters. The Fire (Scotland) Act 2005 has been dangerously ignored through fire exits being blocked, combustible materials being discarded in protected escape routes and serious concerns over the evacuation procedure for disabled employees and visitors. The Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations have been disregarded with corridors being blocked in the basement, unguarded obstructions at head height and the potential for falls coldcock access stairs due to the absence seizure of a suitable handrail. Trip hazards located in areas frequented by your disabled and other employees are also a concern. Employees taking shortcuts through vehicular traffic routes also have the potential for serious injury. awry(p) manual handling techniques can lead to permanent injuries, currently management is not meeting its obligations by providing suitable training and lifting equipment to negate this hazard. Although initially carried out the findings of DSE assessments have not been actioned and new staff have not been included in the procedure. These findings can impact forbidly on employees and digest the potential to affect productivity as well as resulting in injury through long term exposures. There were also breaches under the COSHH regulations which have the potential to lead to illness and injury of employees. prime(prenominal) aid equipment was found to be out of meshing.If the recommendations detailed within this report are not actioned then your organisation may be at risk of negative publicit y, with breaches of health and safety law atomic number 82 to a poor reputation which can have a direct picture on existing business relationships touch your companys financial stability. Employee absence will also have financial implications for your organisation as retraining, recruitment and litigation costs may prove to be substantial. Management must make an apparent motion to improve health and safety inthe workplace, failure to do so is plausibly to impact of employee morale and may have a direct effect on productivity.The recommendations following my inspection of your organisation are detailed in the table below. I strongly recommend that these findings are actioned and that all suitable changes are introduced to your workplace.RecommendationsRecommendationLikely resource implicationsPriorityTarget dateUnblock fire exits and ensure they can be opened in an tweak evacuation. 1 hour for two employees. Financial cost of purchasing secure germinate glass point to house basement fire door key and time costs of organisations joiner to fit box firm onto wall adjacent to door.